STAND FIRM: End Times a Regional War (Part 6) - The Narrative from Post Exilic Prophets
BT Staff

STAND FIRM: End Times a Regional War (Part 6) - The Narrative from Post Exilic Prophets

      Over the past several weeks, I’ve been sharing a message that’s both simple and stunning — when the Bible talks about the end of the age, it speaks of a very specific, very regional conflict. A war between Israel and her neighbors — ancient enemies — spills outward and shakes the whole world. That’s not my opinion. I truly believe it is the repeated end-time storyline in Scripture.

      We began this journey where the disciples did — on the Mount of Olives. They weren’t confused when they asked Jesus about the end. They didn’t ask “what” would happen. They asked “when” it would happen because they already knew the story. They grew up with it. It lived in the Law, was echoed in the History Books and was whispered through the Psalms and Wisdom literature. They’d sung it, memorized it and prayed it. When Jesus answered, He didn’t correct them. He didn’t shift the narrative. He summarized it. He told them what they already knew. Then, He answered their questions.

      We’ve walked through those foundations — the Law drew the first lines of conflict, the History Books put it in motion, the Psalms revealed it in song. Now, we turn to the prophets. Not the familiar ones — Isaiah, Jeremiah or Ezekiel — but the ones that often get overlooked — the post-exilic prophets.

      These men — Haggai, Zechariah and Malachi — spoke after Babylon had fallen, after the exile and after Jerusalem’s destruction. They weren’t writing in anticipation of a “then” judgment. They were writing in the rubble and in the midst of return. That timing matters because it’s often said that the prophets were only warning about Babylon. That their vision wasn’t future — it was immediate. But the post-exilic prophets prove otherwise. They spoke into a moment afterBabylon, yet they still pointed forward — to a final day, a final war and even a final victory.

      Haggai’s focus was rebuilding the temple. But even as he encouraged the people to put stone on top of stone, he spoke of something greater: “I will shake the heavens and the earth... I will overthrow the thrones of kingdoms... and destroy the strength of the Gentile kingdoms” (Haggai 2:21–22 HCSB). That’s not just construction talk. That’s eschatology. The nations are still in view, the conflict isn’t over and it’s not spiritualized. It’s territorial, political and real.

      Then comes Zechariah, and the volume gets turned up. He speaks of Jerusalem as a burdensome stone, a cup of staggering for the nations around her (Zech. 12:2–3). He names the surrounding nations, paints the picture of siege, conflict, fire and deliverance. He sees the nations gather against Jerusalem and the Lord Himself stepping in. This is not Babylon. This is not Rome. This is something still to come. The language is too big and too clear — the context makes that obvious.

      Zechariah 14 leaves no doubt. He describes the day of the Lord when Jerusalem is attacked, the Mount of Olives splitting in two with living water flowing out and the Lord reigning as King over all the earth. That didn’t happen under Persia. It didn’t happen under Greece. It didn’t happen under Rome. This is a picture of a future day, and the pattern is the same — regional conflict, Jerusalem at the center, nations gathering and divine intervention.

      And then Malachi closes the Old Testament, not with closure, but with anticipation. He speaks of the coming of the Lord, of refining fire, of judgment and restoration. He doesn’t lay out geographic maps, but he makes one thing clear — the story’s not over. The Lord is coming, and His enemies will be dealt with. The day is still ahead.

      These prophets weren’t just echoing the past. They were pointing beyond their present. They stood in the shadow of Babylon’s fall, yet their eyes were set on something bigger. They weren’t looking backward — they were looking forward. And they didn’t describe a global, undefined apocalypse. They described a regional, recognizable war. That same story told in the Law, lived in the History Books and sung in the Psalms.

      The disciples weren’t grasping for straws when they asked Jesus about the end. They were pulling threads from Zechariah, Malachi and from the whole sweep of Scripture. Jesus didn’t unravel their understanding — He affirmed it.

      So often we come to the prophetic texts looking for something new — a fresh take or a secret code. However, maybe what we need is to return to the obvious and see what was always there. It’s a narrative of a land promised, a people chosen and enemies surrounding — a final conflict that erupts right where it all began.

      The regional conflict narrative isn’t hidden in the margins of Scripture. It’s the backbone of the story. And the post-exilic prophets, speaking after the dust of Babylon settled, remind us that this isn’t just Israel’s past — it’s the world’s future.

      It’s not just history. It’s the future. It’s the coming of the Messiah’s Kingdom which concludes that regional war that engulfs the world. The disciples knew it, and so should we.

Print
126
BT Staff

BT StaffBT Staff

Other posts by BT Staff
Contact author
Please login or register to post comments.

Contact author

x

Filter:

Sort by:

Filter by Categories

Filter by Authors

Baptist Trumpet logo

Follow Us

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2025 by Baptist Trumpet
Back To Top